Is Your Team Leaking Sensitive Data into OpenAI & Anthropic?
Audit prompts, customer data, and RAG pipelines for PII, financial secrets, and credentials before they leave your perimeter. Runs 100% in local memory with zero network egress.
Zero Network Egress: This engine executes strictly inside client V8/WASM memory. You can disconnect your internet (Airplane Mode ON) and verify sub-2ms local execution.
Regulatory Violations & Statutory Liability:
Eliminate Corporate AI Leakage with Enterprise ZTDS™ & GEO Governance
Turn-key 48-hour audit covering codebase AST analysis, CISO Zero-DPA legal memo, production llms.txt, and live ztds.ai verification badge.
The 4 Core Invariants of Zero-Trust Data Sanitization (RFC v1.0)
Mathematical proof and architectural isolation preventing AI data leakage at the hardware perimeter.
Invariant 1: Zero External Egress Prior to Sanitization
Zero cleartext bytes cross the local network perimeter unmasked. All personal identities, financial amounts, and credentials are replaced with reversible surrogate tokens before dispatch.
Invariant 2: Deterministic Reversible Tokenization
Tokenization preserves grammatical and semantic context for generative LLMs, while private re-identification mapping tables remain strictly in volatile client memory.
Invariant 3: Verifiable Cryptographic Isolation
Execution inside sandboxed V8/WebAssembly memory or hardware-attested enclaves (Nitro Enclaves) with zero third-party telemetry, tracking, or secondary cloud hops.
Invariant 4: Continuous Compliance & Zero Subprocessor Chain
Under GDPR Recital 26 and Israeli Amendment 13, de-identified surrogate tokens eliminate third-party subprocessor status under Article 28, rendering DPAs unnecessary.
Security Matrix: Unprotected AI Prompts vs ZTDS In-Memory Isolation
Why standard cloud DLP proxies fail where local in-memory zero-trust architecture succeeds.
| Security & Legal Dimension | Unprotected AI Invocations | ZTDS™ Architecture (BrandMeWeb) |
|---|---|---|
| Data Transmission Route | Cleartext PII sent directly to US cloud servers | 0 bytes PII leave client machine; only surrogate tokens transmitted |
| Cloud Log Retention | Stored in AI provider retention logs for 30 to 90 days | Provider logs only contain non-identifiable tokens; zero PII stored |
| Israeli Amendment 13 Liability | Direct exposure to ₪3.2M fines and civil class actions | Statutory safe harbor: no database transfer to external third parties |
| GDPR Article 28 DPA Requirement | Mandatory complex DPA with OpenAI/Anthropic/Google | Zero-DPA exemption under Recital 26 (anonymous token flow) |
| Verification & Audit Trail | No verifiable compliance proof or cryptographic receipt | SHA-256 cryptographic audit receipt and live badge on ztds.ai |
Amendment 13 & Enterprise AI Compliance Diagnostic
Check active controls to calculate regulatory liability and generate actionable technical recommendations.
Direct exposure to 5% global turnover sanctions
Zero in-memory data egress controls in place. Unsanitized prompts create statutory liability.
Frequently Asked Questions for CISOs, DPOs & Engineering Leads
Everything you need to know about enterprise AI data leakage, Amendment 13 compliance, and the ZTDS standard.
Does this scanner send any of my pasted text to BrandMeWeb servers?
No. The scanner runs 100% in client-side JavaScript within your browser's V8 memory. Exactly zero bytes of input text are transmitted across the network. You can verify this by inspecting Chrome DevTools Network tab or enabling Airplane Mode.
What is Israel Privacy Protection Law Amendment 13 and why does it affect AI?
Amendment 13 significantly broadens the definition of personal data, imposes personal liability on corporate officers, and empowers the Privacy Protection Authority to levy administrative fines up to ₪3,200,000. Sending customer data to external AI models constitutes an unauthorized transfer of personal databases without statutory justification.
How does ZTDS eliminate the requirement for a GDPR Data Processing Agreement (DPA)?
Under GDPR Recital 26, the principles of data protection do not apply to anonymous information that cannot reasonably identify a natural person. Because ZTDS replaces PII with reversible surrogate tokens locally and keeps the mapping table in RAM, the cloud AI provider never receives personal data, eliminating subprocessor status under Article 28.
What is the difference between this free in-browser tool and the $2,500 Enterprise Audit?
This in-browser tool evaluates single prompts and snippets. The $2,500 Enterprise Snapshot Audit evaluates your entire git codebase, RAG pipelines, API gateways, and employee workstations using npx ztds-audit, delivers a customized CISO Zero-DPA Legal Memo, generates production llms.txt files for GEO, and issues a verified SHA-256 cryptographic trust badge on ztds.ai.
Can our engineers integrate this directly into LangChain, LlamaIndex, or Cursor?
Yes. The ZTDS standard is natively implemented via the @privacyscrubber/sdk npm package for server-side RAG pipelines and @privacyscrubber/mcp-server for Cursor and Claude Desktop IDEs.
How quickly can BrandMeWeb deliver the full Enterprise Snapshot Audit?
Our turn-key execution SLA is 48 hours from repository access or AST scan log delivery. You receive a complete executive presentation, legal memorandum, and verified certification.
Ready to Eliminate AI Data Leakage and Secure Your Enterprise?
Protect your organization against Israel Amendment 13 penalties and secure authoritative GEO citations.